Another family business giving back

Family businesses are often the pillars of their community. A case in point is Peterson Holding Companies, the parent firm of FBA Member Peterson Cat. The company was founded in 1936 by founder and company namesake Howard Peterson and now his grandson, Duane Doyle, is the company president.

On its website, the San Leandro-based heavy equipment dealer devotes a page to community outreach.

Peterson Holding Company, and all wholly owned subsidiaries (“Peterson”), are committed to partnering with nonprofit and charitable organizations within the communities we serve. To request a consideration for a donation or equipment rental for your organization, please complete this application and return it to Peterson in the Community by email, fax, or mail.

Among the numerous charities and nonprofits the company has assisted over the years are TLC for Kids Sports, Miracle League of the North Bay, the National Breast Cancer Foundation, the Susan G Komen Foundation, the Salvation Army, and the Oakland Zoo.

Statistically, family businesses are far more likely to give back to their communities. They are based there, not in a city half a continent away, the owners have likely lived there for generations. They have deep roots.

FBA salutes Peterson and all its members for their community involvement. And we remind state lawmakers and regulators that this is just another reason why California should encourage family businesses to thrive from generation to generation, not hinder them.

Four family businesses join FBA

Firms in Petaluma, West Sacramento, Chico, and Salinas seek to protect family business

Four businesses recently joined the Family Business Association of California, the only organization exclusively working to protect the interests of family businesses in Sacramento.

Clover Sonoma has joined FBA as a founding member, the highest level of membership. The company was founded in1916 as the Petaluma Cooperative Creamery and remained a cooperative until the mid 1970s, when the biggest fire in Petaluma’s history destroyed the processing and bottling operations. Clover Stornetta Farms was born in 1977 when Gene Benedetti purchased the wholesale distribution business after the co-op decided not to rebuild. Gene’s son, Dan, succeeded him as president in 1986 and the company was an early entrant into organics. Third-generation president Marcus Benedetti became president in 2006, and added the title of chairman of the board in 2015. They are a major dairy products company with 240 employees headquartered in Petaluma. The company rebranded as Clover Sonoma in 2017.

Three other businesses have joined as regular members.

The Sacramento River Cats, a Triple A baseball team affiliated with the San Francisco Giants, was founded by Art Savage in 1999 and has been one of the most successful minor league sports teams in the country. Art passed away several years ago after a brief illness, and his wife, Susan, is now CEO and majority owner, and son Jeff is president of the team. The team is headquartered in West Sacramento where they play baseball at Raley Field. They have 60 full time employees.

Chico-based Northgate Petroleum Company was founded in 1922 with a two-horse-drawn tank wagon. It also established Chico’s first Shell gas station. Bud Caldwell and a partner purchased the company in 1988 and they provide fuels and lubricants in Northern California and Central Nevada.

And Corral De Tierra Cattle Company is a first-generation Monterey County ranch raising grass-finished Angus cattle and providing land management services. The first-generation company owned by Mark Farr focuses on raising premium beef while incorporating regenerative land stewardship into its day-to-day management.

 

FBA Executive Director Robert Rivinius said the four companies recognize the challenges of doing business in California and seek to remain family-owned in the years to come.

“California’s family businesses are the pillars of their communities. They create the bulk of new jobs, look at the long-term, treat their employees as extended family and stakeholders, and are far more responsive to local needs than corporations headquartered thousands of miles away,” Rivinius said.

“Yet the state’s ever-increasing tax and regulatory burden makes it harder and harder for these firms to remain strong. This year, FBA led a coalition to defeat a dangerous plan to impose a California inheritance tax that would have jeopardized the future existence of many of these companies, and these four businesses recognize the need for family businesses to band together.”

About the Family Business Association of California (FBA): Founded in 2012, the Family Business Association of California is the only organization working exclusively at the Capitol to educate lawmakers and regulators about the importance of family businesses to the state’s economy and to their communities – and to advocate positions on legislation and regulations. For more information, visit www.myfba.org.

New FBA Video explains why family businesses should join

FBA has prepared a new video to promote membership in the Association. Produced by Marquee Media US, it features several FBA officers, board members, and company owners saying why FBA is crucial to the continued success of family businesses in California and how more members can expand our influence at the Capitol.

Thanks to Chairman Ken Monroe, Treasurer/Secretary Grant Deary, Board Members Kurt Glassman, Carol Burger, and Alfred Garcia, and Corrie Nichols Davis, the managing partner of Founding Member Gorrill Ranch, for assisting in the production.

The video can be viewed on the About Us page. Please feel free to share it with fellow members and prospects!

The Developing Trade War & Interest Rates

 

Elliot Eisenberg, Ph.D., GraphsandLaughs, LLC

August 1, 2018

The U.S. economy is, at present, growing very rapidly, and 2018 is shaping up to be the best year for economic growth since 2006. As a result, the Federal Reserve is a lock to raise rates by a quarter-point in September, and there is at least a 70% chance that they will do so again in December to cool down growth and prevent inflation from taking hold. But plenty can go wrong with this forecast. Contagion from an emerging market or financial crisis is always possible, but the biggest immediate threat comes from the rapidly escalating trade war we are in.

Elliot Eisenberg

The most likely outcome of rising trade tariffs is a premature pause in the current interest rate rising cycle. This is because a trade war will cause business demand for physical plant, equipment, and employees to contract due to heightened economic uncertainty. Trade wars will also cause consumer demand to lessen due to rising unemployment, higher prices, and falling consumer confidence, exacerbated by a decline in equity values. While such a slowdown would not be expected to be that large, it would still slow GDP growth and interest rate increases. If, however, the hit to GDP is bigger than anticipated, because the quantity of imported goods facing steep tariffs rises substantially, rates could be reduced to ward off a possible recession. That would only occur if other factors came into play, as the current $50 billion in products facing tariffs along with any retaliatory actions by other nations is not nearly large enough to meaningfully reduce GDP, let alone drive us into recession.

The bigger fear is that a trade war has the opposite effect on monetary policy and forces the Fed to raise interest rates. If this occurs, it would be very destructive to both Main Street and Wall Street. For this to happen, the economy would need to experience a series of strong negative supply shocks. It might happen like this: global trade conflicts quickly escalate, significantly driving up the cost of many imported goods as well as domestically-produced substitutes. This sudden rise in prices would raise production costs, which would, in turn, lead to inflation and a rise in the dollar and unemployment as exports decline and policy uncertainty rises. Worse, the rise in inflation could cause long-term inflation expectations to not only rise but also become somewhat permanently embedded in markets, such that higher inflation expectations persist even after the economy returns to normal. This is precisely what happened in the late 1960s and eventually led to 20% interest rates in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

With this history still quite fresh in the institutional memory of the Federal Reserve, policy makers would be expected to respond to such a situation by raising interest rates to wring out any permanent rise in inflation expectations. This is precisely what was done in the early 1980s by then Fed Chairman Paul Volker. Of course, this rise in rates would slow growth and weaken the economy even more.

While the chances of seeing rates rise to ward off a rise in inflation expectations is highly unlikely, it is a worst case-scenario for both the economy and financial markets. This is because it offers a combination of faster inflation, weaker growth, and tighter monetary policy. My baseline is that the impacts of rising tariffs and protectionism are too limited to meaningfully alter the course of monetary policy. But, in the fog of (a trade) war, things inevitably go awry — just think of Harley-Davidson’s unexpected decision to shift to offshore manufacturing — and adversaries respond in ways not anticipated; be prepared.

Elliot Eisenberg, Ph.D. is President of GraphsandLaughs, LLC and can be reached at Elliot@graphsandlaughs.net.  His daily 70-word economics and policy blog can be seen at www.econ70.com.  You can subscribe and have the blog delivered directly to your email by visiting the website or by texting the word “BOWTIE” to 22828.

FBA lobbyists look ahead to August

By Dennis Albiani and Faith Lane Borges

The Legislature has adjourned for a month long summer recess and will return on August 6th for the final four weeks of this legislative year. A month “off of work” is hardly the summer dream it sounds like. All statewide offices, Assembly seats and half of the Senate is up for election in November and the summer will be spent shaking hands, kissing babies, and negotiating the final compromises on the remaining 1,800 bills that can be voted on prior to the August 31 Final Recess.

The Assembly remains under the leadership of Speaker Anthony Rendon and the Senate is being captained by former Assembly Speaker turned President Pro Tem Toni Atkins, who recently replaced Kevin de León. After the special elections in June, both leaders enjoy near-supermajorities in their houses, with the Senate one Democrat short after the recall of Josh Newman. This ensures relative ease of passage for leadership priorities that require a simple majority vote. However, there remains a small handful of bills that would need to garner a two-thirds majority vote. Chief among those bills are tax measures SB 993 and SB 623.

Earlier this year, FBA legislative advocates and a coalition of employer groups were successful in temporarily stopping a huge tax increase proposed in SB 993 (Hertzberg). This bill would impose a tax on all services purchased by California businesses with gross receipts of more than $100,000 a year with limited exceptions. FBA Treasurer/Secretary Grant Deary provided key testimony in the Senate Governance and Finance Committee on the significant competitive disadvantage this would force on family business employers at a time when we should be providing incentives for family businesses to continue to create jobs and invest in California. This bill was held in the committee but the fight continues as an informational hearing to discuss imposing taxes on services used by businesses has been scheduled for August 8.

This hearing is intended to provide a broad overview of our existing tax structure as well as discuss concerns with implementing and administering a tax on services. As an informational hearing, the committee does NOT plan to vote on SB 993 on August 8. Additional informational hearings may be scheduled during the legislative recess in Northern and Southern California. We will keep members apprised of related developments and will continue to lead efforts to stop this tax increase of tens of billions of dollars a year which would hurt working families by causing less economic growth, lower wages, and fewer jobs.

The other bill we’re keeping a close eye on is SB 623 (Monning), which would provide a monthly assessment on every water user in California. The legislation would create  the Safe Drinking Water Account to provide grants and loans to water entities located in disadvantaged communities to clean up contaminated groundwater. The assessment would be $10 a year for residential customers and would not exceed $12 a month on commercial and industrial customers.

The bill also would includes an assessment on fertilizer and animal agriculture to address nitrate contamination but provides agricultural interests participating in the program a safe harbor from enforcement by the Water Resources Control Board. Many in agriculture are supporting the assessment due to aggressive enforcement actions being implemented by the current Water Board but many water districts oppose it because of the cost.